The fact that she appears naked in the majority of her latest high-end fashion shoots should not be lost on those who are caught up in the titillation of it all. Whether deliberate or not, she's nude because, like the rest of us average-sized women, she would struggle to fit into the size zero to four sample-sized clothing design houses usually wheel out for photo shoots.
While the fashion-loving reality TV star, who got her start working as a "wardrobe organiser" for Paris Hilton, would never be considered "plus size" everything she would wear on set, and sometimes even on the street, would require a lot of tailoring around her petite, busty and hourglass frame.
Advertisement
Sure these images, styled by renowned editor Katie Grand and shot by
the equally well-regarded Steven Klein, are artistic but could these
photos of Kardashian's fit-looking figure be trying to tell the fashion
designers of the world to relax and let the seams out a little?Small sample sizes make fiscal sense for an industry that is used to tightening its belt but they are also to blame for creating the divide between "models" and "plus-size models". Plus size, by definition, is anything over an Australian size 12. The average Australian woman is between a size 14 to 16.
"I was never a catwalk model. I never really fit in the clothes. I was always too curvy, I was always a lingerie model, even when I was still in Germany when I won my modelling contest I would do lingerie and swimsuits because I was always too curvy for high fashion," she told PS recently.
The model, who returned to the Victoria's Secret catwalk just five weeks after giving birth to her fourth child, doesn't hold a grudge but can't see the industry embracing "real women".
"It's not really up to me. It's up to the designers and most of the time they prefer really thin girls not with a lot of curves, not with a lot of cleavage and hips, so it's really up to them, they kind of rule the market in terms of what kind of models make it," she said.
This issue of "real women" is also broached within the new issue of Love via a photo essay titled "Boobs" featuring Kardashian's waif-like sister, Kendall Jenner.
The close-to-six foot tall model appears topless alongside other size zero models wearing large prosthetic breasts and backsides. The inspiration for the photos was to show how breasts and butts of a certain size don't fit into high-fashion. Literally.
"We're so accustomed to the shape that's been on the runway for the past 20 years that I don't know how honest this new, more curvaceous figure is as an intention. It seems like a bit of a publicity stunt," Love's fashion director Panos Yiapanis said.
"When Katie [Grand] told me that she was going to shoot Kim [Kardashian], I thought this was the perfect chance to do this idea that I'd been wanting to do. A lot of designers seem to be courting people like Kim, but at the same time the clothes that they make still don't really fit that body, unless they're custom-made. There's a slight insincerity to that."
One designer who is perhaps playing close attention to the realistic female form is Balmain creative director Olivier Rousteing, who has since cast Kardashian to star in the luxury brand's upcoming spring/summer 2015 advertising campaign.
In 2004, before his tenure, the French label was on the brink of financial collapse. Shortly after his arrival in 2011 when he began rubbing shoulders and dressing the Kardashians and Beyonces of the world, revenue doubled, thus highlighting the fact that the only thing that should be "plus size" in fashion, is a profit margin.
Source:http://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/private-sydney/why-kim-kardashian-should-pose-nude-more-often-20150214-1392v7.html

No comments:
Post a Comment